Notifications
Clear all

got denied for a permit—what would you do next?

673 Posts
595 Users
0 Reactions
9,212 Views
mevans54
Posts: 6
(@mevans54)
Active Member
Joined:

Also, I keep a folder (old school, I know) with every version of my plans and correspondence. It’s a pain, but when they “misplace” something, you’re not starting from scratch.

That “old school” folder is honestly underrated. Digital’s great until you’re standing at the counter and their system’s “down for maintenance.” Paper copies have saved my skin more than once.

One thing I’d add—don’t just accept the denial as gospel. Sometimes the reviewer’s just having a bad day or missed something in your plans. I’ve had luck politely pushing back, especially if I can point to code or previous approvals. It’s not about being combative, just showing you’ve done your homework.

Also, if you’re doing anything remotely green or unconventional, expect extra scrutiny. I had to explain what a greywater system was three times before they’d even look at my application. Persistence (and patience) pays off, but man, it can be a slog.


Reply
Posts: 6
(@dwanderer15)
Active Member
Joined:

Paper folders are handy, but honestly, I’ve found that a well-organized digital trail can be just as bulletproof—if you’re a bit obsessive about backups. I scan every signed doc and save emails as PDFs, then dump them in a cloud folder. That way, even if I’m at the counter and their system’s down, I can pull up what I need on my phone or tablet. It’s saved me from lugging around a binder the size of a phone book. Not saying paper’s dead, but digital’s caught up if you’re careful.

On pushing back after a denial, I get the logic, but sometimes it feels like you’re just spinning your wheels. Last year, I tried to challenge a rejection for an attic conversion—had all my ducks in a row, code references highlighted and everything. The reviewer just kept repeating “not standard practice” like it was gospel. After three rounds of “clarifications,” I ended up tweaking the plans to fit their comfort zone anyway. Maybe it’s different in other places, but here they don’t budge much unless you know someone upstairs.

The green/unconventional stuff is spot on though. Tried to get approval for SIP panels once—felt like I was teaching a seminar every time I walked in there. They wanted stamped engineering letters for things that were already in the codebook. Persistence is key, but sometimes you have to pick your battles or risk burning out.

Curious if anyone’s actually managed to get something truly outside-the-box approved without months of back-and-forth? Sometimes it feels like they want innovation until you actually show up with it...


Reply
Posts: 27
(@cloud_coder)
Eminent Member
Joined:

I swear, getting a permit approved for anything remotely creative is like trying to convince my 1920s house to accept modern plumbing—it resists at every turn. I once tried to get approval for restoring original wood windows with custom storm inserts. The reviewer looked at me like I’d suggested using bubble wrap for insulation. Has anyone found a way to make these folks more open-minded, or is it just a matter of wearing them down with charm and paperwork?


Reply
richardfisher
Posts: 10
(@richardfisher)
Active Member
Joined:

Title: Got Denied For A Permit—What Would You Do Next?

I get where you’re coming from, but I’ve actually had a bit of luck taking a different tack. Instead of trying to win them over with charm (which, let’s be honest, only gets you so far when someone’s staring at a checklist), I started bringing in examples from other cities or historic districts that have approved similar upgrades. It’s like, “Hey, look, Charleston’s preservation board is cool with this—maybe we could be too?” Sometimes it helps them see you’re not just making stuff up.

One time I wanted to put in reclaimed wood siding on a 1915 bungalow. The first response was basically, “Nope, not period-appropriate.” But after I showed them a few case studies and even brought in a local architect who’d done similar work, they started to soften. Took a couple rounds of paperwork and a lot of patience, but eventually they signed off. I think sometimes the reviewers just need to see that your idea isn’t totally out of left field.

I will say, though, there are some folks who just dig their heels in no matter what. In those cases, I try to find some middle ground—like, maybe I can use the storm inserts but tweak the design so it looks more traditional from the street. Not always ideal, but better than nothing.

It’s definitely not a quick process, and yeah, sometimes it feels like you’re speaking two different languages. But I wouldn’t say they’re all hopelessly closed-minded. Some just need a little more convincing—or maybe just a really good set of before-and-after photos.


Reply
shadowshadow536
Posts: 8
(@shadowshadow536)
Active Member
Joined:

I’ve run into the same brick wall with historic boards—sometimes it’s like they’re guarding a secret club. What’s worked for me is sketching out a few compromise options and asking which one they’d prefer. They seem to appreciate being part of the solution, even if it takes a few tries. Hang in there, it’s usually just a waiting game.


Reply
Page 125 / 135
Share:
Scroll to Top