Notifications
Clear all

Building a deck that doesn’t wreck the planet

265 Posts
259 Users
0 Reactions
1,203 Views
michaelgamer8343
Posts: 11
(@michaelgamer8343)
Active Member
Joined:

“I swear every ‘no maintenance’ product just means ‘different maintenance.’”

You nailed it. I went with cedar on my last place, thinking it’d be the “natural” choice, but it still needed oiling or it turned gray and splintery. Composite looks good at first but I’ve seen the slippery issue too. It’s like, pick your poison: regular cleaning, re-sealing, or tiptoeing across a plastic slip-n-slide. Sometimes I think old-fashioned pressure-treated pine, ugly as it is, might be the most honest option…


Reply
Posts: 12
(@frodo_smith)
Active Member
Joined:

Pressure-treated pine is definitely the “honest” option, but I always wonder about the chemicals in it—especially if you’ve got kids or pets hanging out on the deck.

“Composite looks good at first but I’ve seen the slippery issue too.”
That’s been my experience as well, especially after a rain. Have you looked into thermally modified woods? They’re pricier, but supposedly last longer without all the harsh treatments. Curious if anyone’s had luck with those.


Reply
dance289
Posts: 4
(@dance289)
New Member
Joined:

I get the concern about chemicals in pressure-treated pine, but honestly, I’ve had more issues with composite than just slipperiness. The fading and warping after a couple of years can be a pain, and replacing boards isn’t cheap or easy. Thermally modified wood sounds great on paper, but the upfront cost is pretty steep—are you really getting that much more longevity for the price? I’ve seen a few decks built with it in my area, and while they look sharp, I’m not convinced they’ll outlast a well-maintained hardwood or even a properly sealed pine deck.

If you’re worried about chemicals, what about using something like cedar? It’s naturally resistant and doesn’t need all the treatments. Yeah, it’s not the cheapest either, but at least you know what you’re getting. Just seems like every “eco” option comes with its own trade-offs... nothing’s perfect.


Reply
tiggerw66
Posts: 16
(@tiggerw66)
Active Member
Joined:

Cedar’s definitely a classic, but I’ve had mixed results with it holding up long-term, especially in wetter climates. If you’re factoring in total cost of ownership, sometimes the extra up-front for thermally modified wood pays off—less maintenance, fewer replacements down the line. I get the sticker shock, but over 15-20 years, it can actually pencil out better than you’d think. Composite’s hit or miss for me too... depends a lot on the brand and install. For “eco” options, I’ve actually started looking at reclaimed hardwood—sometimes you can find old ipe or teak that’s already weathered and still has decades left. Not cheap, but pretty bulletproof.


Reply
Posts: 2
(@chess326)
New Member
Joined:

Has anyone tried using locally sourced woods that aren’t the usual cedar or redwood? I keep hearing about black locust as a super durable, eco-friendly option, but I haven’t seen it in person. Wondering if it’s actually affordable or just another “sounds good on paper” thing. Also, for reclaimed hardwood—how do you even find that stuff without paying a fortune? Feels like every time I look, it’s either crazy expensive or already spoken for...


Reply
Page 8 / 53
Share:
Scroll to Top