"Anyone else notice rebates seem easier to snag lately, or am I just getting better at paperwork?"
Funny you mention that—I thought the same thing recently. Maybe it's because more companies are pushing green initiatives? Curious though, has anyone tackled solar panels on historic homes yet...worth the hassle?
"Curious though, has anyone tackled solar panels on historic homes yet...worth the hassle?"
Honestly, from experience, solar on historic homes can be a headache—permits, aesthetics, preservation rules. Sometimes better off investing in insulation or efficient windows first...less hassle, quicker payoff.
"Honestly, from experience, solar on historic homes can be a headache—permits, aesthetics, preservation rules. Sometimes better off investing in insulation or efficient windows first...less hassle, quicker payoff."
Totally agree here. We looked into solar for our older place last year, and the hoops you have to jump through with the historical society...yikes. Instead, we went step-by-step, starting with attic insulation (biggest bang for your buck), then weatherstripping doors and windows, and finally upgrading to energy-efficient appliances as the old ones died. Saved money, headaches, and our utility bills dropped noticeably.
I get the hassle factor, but maybe it's worth reconsidering solar? A neighbor of mine managed to get approval by using low-profile panels that blend in surprisingly well. Took longer, sure, but now they're saving big and still preserving the home's character...just a thought.
Interesting point about low-profile panels. When we renovated, I initially dismissed solar because of aesthetics and the approval process...but after seeing a friend's electric bill drop significantly, I'm reconsidering. The rebates helped offset their upfront costs too, making the numbers look pretty compelling. Still weighing the hassle vs. savings though—decisions, decisions.
