Notifications
Clear all

Finally switched to keyless entry and here's what I noticed

521 Posts
470 Users
0 Reactions
4,395 Views
Posts: 1
(@mary_coder)
New Member
Joined:

"It's surprising how quickly someone can spot even the most cleverly hidden lockboxes if they're determined enough."

Yeah, that's a really good point. People underestimate how observant someone can be when they're actively looking for something. I've seen some pretty creative hiding spots fail spectacularly because the homeowner didn't consider that thieves often know exactly what to look for.

I went with a keyless entry system myself about two years ago, and while I haven't had any major mishaps (yet), I did run into an unexpected issue. We had a power outage that lasted almost a full day, and it completely slipped my mind that my keypad was battery-powered but linked to a smart home hub inside the house. Without power, the hub went offline, and suddenly my fancy remote access was useless. Thankfully, the keypad itself still worked fine, but it made me realize how dependent I'd become on remote unlocking.

Since then, I've been thinking about redundancy and backups more seriously. I ended up installing a small mechanical lockbox as a backup—bolted down securely, of course—and it's given me peace of mind knowing there's always a fallback option.

I'm curious though, has anyone else considered or tried biometric entry systems like fingerprint scanners? I've heard mixed reviews about reliability and weather resistance, especially in colder climates or humid areas. Seems like it could be convenient, but I'm hesitant to trust something that sensitive to outdoor conditions...


Reply
eroberts86
Posts: 10
(@eroberts86)
Active Member
Joined:

Honestly, biometric systems seem a bit pricey and finicky for my taste. I went with a simple mechanical keypad—no batteries, no power issues, and way cheaper. Sometimes low-tech solutions just make more sense...


Reply
Posts: 7
(@marleys20)
Active Member
Joined:

I get where you're coming from with the mechanical keypad. A few years back, I installed a biometric lock on our side door, thinking it'd be convenient—no keys, quick access, all that jazz. But honestly, it turned out to be more trouble than it was worth. It worked great...until it didn't. Cold weather seemed to mess with the fingerprint reader, and sometimes it'd take four or five tries before unlocking. Eventually, I swapped it out for a mechanical keypad similar to yours, and haven't looked back since.

The simplicity of the mechanical keypad is definitely underrated. No batteries to change, no worries about power outages, and it's pretty much foolproof. Sure, it lacks the flashy tech appeal, but reliability matters more when you're standing outside in the freezing rain trying to get in. Sometimes the simplest solution really is the best one.


Reply
adamrodriguez260
Posts: 13
(@adamrodriguez260)
Active Member
Joined:

Had a similar experience with one of those fancy smart locks. Worked fine until the battery died unexpectedly—of course, at night, in the rain. Switched to mechanical keypad after that fiasco and haven't had an issue since. Sometimes low-tech really is the way to go...


Reply
danielpodcaster
Posts: 7
(@danielpodcaster)
Active Member
Joined:

"Sometimes low-tech really is the way to go..."

Couldn't agree more. When we renovated our place, I got talked into installing one of those fancy fingerprint locks. Seemed cool at first, but it refused to recognize my thumbprint half the time—especially when my hands were dirty from yard work or cooking. Ended up standing outside wiping my thumb on my jeans like an idiot. Switched back to a mechanical keypad and haven't looked back since. Lesson learned: simple usually wins out.


Reply
Page 43 / 105
Share:
Scroll to Top