The inspector barely glanced at the structural supports I'd spent weeks obsessing over, but spent ages measuring the railing height—twice.
Went through something similar when we put in our storm cellar a few years back. Inspector was mostly concerned about ventilation and exit clearance, barely glanced at the actual structure. Permits can feel like a hassle, but honestly, they're useful if you ever sell the place or have insurance claims later. Learned that the hard way with our old carriage house renovation... paperwork's annoying, but it does save headaches down the road.
Had almost the exact experience with our deck inspection—spent forever triple-checking joists and footings, and the guy just whipped out his tape measure for railing gaps. It's frustrating, but hey, at least you know your supports are rock solid even if nobody else notices...
I've been through similar situations with inspections, and honestly, it's a mixed bag. On one hand, yeah, it feels like a waste of time when you spend hours making sure everything is structurally perfect, and the inspector barely glances at it. But on the other hand, having that paperwork can save you a ton of headaches down the road—especially if you're ever planning to sell or refinance.
When it comes to backyard storm shelters specifically, I'd say city paperwork is even more important. I know it's tempting to skip permits because it seems like just another bureaucratic hoop to jump through, but trust me, it's worth doing right from the start. I've seen deals fall apart or get delayed significantly because of unpermitted structures. Buyers and lenders get nervous when something isn't documented properly, and suddenly you're scrambling to prove everything was built safely.
Plus, there's always that slim chance something goes wrong—maybe a neighbor complains or there's an insurance claim down the line—and suddenly you're dealing with fines or liability issues. Not fun.
I had a property once where the previous owner built a small shed without permits. Seemed harmless enough until we tried selling. The buyer's lender flagged it during appraisal, and we had to either tear it down or go through retroactive permitting. Ended up costing way more in time and money than if they'd just done it right initially.
So yeah, inspectors can be frustratingly inconsistent (like your railing-gap guy), but getting permits for something as significant as a storm shelter is definitely worth the hassle in my experience. Better safe than sorry...
"I've seen deals fall apart or get delayed significantly because of unpermitted structures."
Yep, been there. Had a client once who built a gorgeous deck—no permit, figured "who'd notice?" Well, the neighbor noticed... and complained. Ended up costing triple the original estimate after fines and retroactive permits. Inspectors might drive us nuts sometimes, but paperwork's usually cheaper than regret. Better to grumble now than cry later, right?
I've definitely seen similar situations unfold. Permits can feel like a hassle, especially when you're trying to keep costs down, but they're usually there for good reason. A neighbor of mine built a storm shelter without permits—looked great, seemed sturdy—but when he tried selling the house, it became a huge headache. Inspectors flagged it immediately.
"paperwork's usually cheaper than regret."
Exactly true. Has anyone here successfully navigated retroactive permits without breaking the bank? Curious how that went...
