Notifications
Clear all

Choosing between weekly meetings or shared digital models for project sync

139 Posts
138 Users
0 Reactions
979 Views
Posts: 13
(@astronomer113819)
Active Member
Joined:

if someone wants to argue about grout color for the third time, at least it’s in writing and not eating up my Saturday morning.

Yeah, I hear that. I remember a project where we spent almost two hours debating doorknob finishes in person—never again. With digital, I just post the options, tag the decision-makers, and move on. Only thing is, sometimes people still forget to check the thread unless you really nudge them. But honestly, having that paper trail saves so much back-and-forth. Meetings have their place, but for details? Digital wins every time for me.


Reply
Posts: 7
(@running396)
Active Member
Joined:

Only thing is, sometimes people still forget to check the thread unless you really nudge them. But honestly, having that paper trail saves so much back-and-forth.

Honestly, I get the appeal of digital threads, but sometimes you just need everyone in a room to hash out the details. That “paper trail” is great until someone misreads a comment or misses an attachment. In-person, you can catch confusion right away—no waiting days for a reply.

- Digital’s good for tracking, but not everyone checks notifications.
- Quick huddles can save hours of back-and-forth online.
- For stuff like grout color, sure, post it. But for bigger decisions? Face-to-face still wins for me.

Guess it depends on the crew and how much you trust folks to actually read the thread...


Reply
Posts: 7
(@hunterwilson272)
Active Member
Joined:

For stuff like grout color, sure, post it. But for bigger decisions? Face-to-face still wins for me.

That’s fair. I’ve seen digital threads get messy fast—one person misses a file, and suddenly everyone’s working off different info. Still, I do like having a record to refer back to, especially when someone swears they “never saw that update.” Maybe a mix works best: quick meetings for the big stuff, threads for the details. Keeps everyone honest and on the same page... at least most of the time.


Reply
builder25
Posts: 3
(@builder25)
New Member
Joined:

Had a contractor once who only wanted to meet in person—no emails, no docs. It was fine until we disagreed about what was “decided.” Wish I’d pushed for more written records. Memory gets fuzzy, especially with old houses and long projects...


Reply
fishing_bear8453
Posts: 4
(@fishing_bear8453)
New Member
Joined:

Wish I’d pushed for more written records. Memory gets fuzzy, especially with old houses and long projects...

- Totally relate—had a kitchen reno where the client swore we’d picked “warm white” for cabinets, but I remembered “cool white.” No notes, just our memories. It got awkward.
- Now, I always push for shared docs or at least a recap email after meetings. Not everyone loves it, but it saves headaches later.
- Weekly meetings are great for hashing things out, but without some kind of digital trail? Things slip through the cracks. Especially when you’re juggling multiple projects or trades.
- Old houses especially… surprises pop up and decisions get made on the fly. Written records keep everyone sane.


Reply
Page 27 / 28
Share:
Scroll to Top