Notifications
Clear all

Dealing with city red tape for building approvals

380 Posts
367 Users
0 Reactions
2,764 Views
astrology248
Posts: 12
(@astrology248)
Active Member
Joined:

I hear you on the digital submissions being a pain. Last year I tried to get approval for a new porch railing—nothing fancy, just something that wouldn’t look out of place on a 1920s house. The online portal kicked back my application three times because the photo file size was “too large” or the scanned signature wasn’t “clear enough.” Meanwhile, when I finally dragged everything down to the office in person, the guy behind the counter barely glanced at half of it and stamped it through.

Honestly, sometimes I think the digital systems are set up just to weed people out. It’s like they want you to give up before you even start. I get that details matter, especially with old homes, but it feels like they’re missing the forest for the trees. Give me a real person over an online checklist any day... even if they’re picky, at least you can talk things through.


Reply
lpupper85
Posts: 4
(@lpupper85)
New Member
Joined:

I get where you’re coming from, but I actually prefer the digital stuff—at least in theory. Isn’t it supposed to save us time and trips across town? I mean, yeah, the file size thing is annoying, but once you figure out their weird requirements, you can just upload from home and not have to take off work. Plus, with in-person, you never know if you’ll get someone who’s having a bad day and decides to nitpick everything. Maybe the real issue is they don’t make the online process clear enough? Or maybe I’m just too cheap to pay for parking downtown...


Reply
fitness505
Posts: 6
(@fitness505)
Active Member
Joined:

Honestly, I hear you on the digital side being more convenient—at least in theory. But in practice, I’ve run into a few headaches that make me question if it’s really saving time. Here’s what I’ve noticed after a bunch of projects:

- The file size limits are all over the place. Sometimes you compress everything down, but then the plans are unreadable. Other times, their portal just crashes mid-upload and you have to start over.
- The instructions for what they want (file types, naming conventions, etc.) are usually buried in some outdated PDF or hidden behind three links. I’ve had submissions kicked back just because I used “PlanSet1” instead of “Plan_Set_1.” No joke.
- On the flip side, when you go in person, at least you can get immediate feedback. If something’s off, they’ll usually point it out right there and you can fix it on the spot. Online, you might wait a week just to get a vague rejection note.

That said, not having to pay for parking or take half a day off work is a big plus. I’m with you there.

What’s worked for me:
- Call the permit office and ask for their most recent digital submission checklist. Sometimes they’ll email you a cheat sheet that isn’t even posted online.
- Double-check file names and formats before uploading—sounds basic but it’s saved me from dumb rejections.
- If your city has a “pre-screen” option online, use it. Cuts down on surprises later.

I still think the digital process could be way clearer. Maybe they’re just playing catch-up tech-wise, or maybe they want to keep us guessing... Either way, I’d rather deal with clunky uploads than another round of downtown parking meters.

Just my two cents from getting bounced around both systems more times than I care to admit.


Reply
river_walker
Posts: 10
(@river_walker)
Active Member
Joined:

Sometimes you compress everything down, but then the plans are unreadable.

Man, I’ve had that happen more times than I’d like to admit. Last month, I sent in a set that looked like a pixelated treasure map by the time it finally fit under their 25MB limit. Got it kicked back for “illegible details.” No kidding. I do miss being able to just point at a sheet and say, “See, that’s a window, not a smudge.” But yeah, not having to circle the block for parking is worth something… even if I’m now fighting with PDFs instead of meters.


Reply
sophiesinger
Posts: 15
(@sophiesinger)
Active Member
Joined:

I sent in a set that looked like a pixelated treasure map by the time it finally fit under their 25MB limit.

That’s basically what happened with my kitchen reno plans. I spent hours getting every cabinet and outlet just right, then had to shrink the file so much the inspector called to ask if I’d drawn it with a crayon. I get why they want things digital, but honestly, sometimes it feels like they care more about file size than what’s actually on the page. Still beats waiting in line at city hall, but barely.


Reply
Page 76 / 76
Share:
Scroll to Top