Notifications
Clear all

Keeping hardwood shiny without losing my mind

598 Posts
543 Users
0 Reactions
6,708 Views
ben_inferno
Posts: 5
(@ben_inferno)
Active Member
Joined:

I hear you on the walnut oil. I tried it once on the old pine in my front parlor—looked great for about a month, then the smell started creeping in. Not terrible, but definitely not what you want when you’re trying to impress guests. I ended up scrubbing it out and switching to Osmo, like you mentioned. It’s not as “pure” as just using oil, but honestly, I’d rather spend my weekends enjoying the house than fussing over floors.

The finish is matte but has a richer look than just bare wood. Not super shiny, but definitely not dull either.

That’s exactly it. There’s something about that soft sheen that feels right in an older place—doesn’t scream “brand new,” but doesn’t look neglected either. You’re on the right track. Sometimes a little compromise between tradition and practicality is the best way to keep your sanity (and your floors) intact.


Reply
Posts: 14
(@coffee826)
Active Member
Joined:

Not terrible, but definitely not what you want when you’re trying to impress guests. I ended up scrubbing it out and switching to Osmo, like you mentioned.

That “soft sheen” you mentioned really does hit the sweet spot. I tried to go full traditional with tung oil on my first go—looked great for about a week, then every footprint and water ring showed up like a crime scene. I get the appeal of pure oils, but honestly, I’m not cut out for that level of maintenance. Osmo’s been way less stressful, and I don’t feel like I’m sacrificing too much on the look. Sometimes “good enough” is the real win.


Reply
Posts: 12
(@archer496702)
Active Member
Joined:

Osmo’s been way less stressful, and I don’t feel like I’m sacrificing too much on the look.

I totally get what you mean about the “crime scene” effect—tung oil can be brutal for that. I’ve seen clients fall in love with the idea of pure oils, only to regret it after the first dinner party. Osmo’s soft sheen is a nice compromise, but I sometimes wonder if we’re all just chasing that elusive balance between beauty and sanity. Has anyone tried Bona or Rubio Monocoat for this? Curious if they’re any less fussy in real life.


Reply
michaelhernandez963
Posts: 8
(@michaelhernandez963)
Active Member
Joined:

I actually went with Bona Traffic HD for my first reno, and honestly, it’s been less “fussy” than I expected. It’s not as natural-looking as Osmo or Rubio, but the maintenance is pretty much mop-and-go. The only thing is, it does have a bit more of that “finished” look—less wood grain popping through. If you’re after that raw wood vibe, it might not be the one, but for sanity’s sake, it’s hard to beat. I haven’t tried Rubio yet, though... kind of nervous about the one-coat promise.


Reply
Posts: 14
(@sports785)
Active Member
Joined:

Keeping Hardwood Shiny Without Losing My Mind

It’s not as natural-looking as Osmo or Rubio, but the maintenance is pretty much mop-and-go.

That’s been my experience too—Bona Traffic HD is like the “set it and forget it” of floor finishes. I get what you mean about the finished look, though. If you want that “just-cut-the-tree” vibe, it’s not quite there. But honestly, after a few years of muddy boots and spilled coffee, I’ll take easy cleaning over perfect grain any day.

Rubio’s one-coat thing is tempting, but I’ve seen a few folks get tripped up by uneven application or missing spots. It’s not *hard*, but you’ve gotta be methodical—think slow and steady, not weekend warrior mode. Plus, with oils like Rubio or Osmo, you’re signing up for more regular touch-ups. Not a dealbreaker, just something to keep in mind if you’re hoping to avoid the “forever refinishing” cycle.

If you’re leaning eco-friendly, Osmo’s hardwax oil is solid—smells better than most polyurethanes too. But yeah... nothing beats mop-and-go when life gets busy.


Reply
Page 92 / 120
Share:
Scroll to Top