Notifications
Clear all

Bumping out vs. building up: which way to expand?

293 Posts
281 Users
0 Reactions
2,540 Views
amandar18
Posts: 5
(@amandar18)
Active Member
Joined:

Permit fees are a whole saga, right?

“Permit fees are wild—mine doubled when I added a window. Who knew glass was so controversial?”
It’s almost like the city thinks we’re smuggling diamonds instead of letting in sunlight. I’ve seen clients get hit with crazy costs just for wanting a bit more daylight in a kitchen.

I get what you mean about bump-outs feeling less intimidating. They’re more approachable, especially if you’re not ready to commit to a massive overhaul. But honestly, those “few inches” can make or break a room’s vibe. I’ve worked on spaces where losing even 18” meant the difference between fitting a dining table or not. Sometimes it’s worth pushing the envelope (and the wall) a little further if you can swing it.

Building up is a different animal. The structural headaches alone... especially with older homes. And good luck finding a contractor who won’t quote you something that makes you question your life choices. Still, I’ve seen some second-story additions that totally transformed a house—just usually after a lot of Advil and paperwork.

At the end of the day, neither option is perfect. But if you’re already dealing with permits, might as well make it count, right?


Reply
birdwatcher38
Posts: 19
(@birdwatcher38)
Active Member
Joined:

It’s almost like the city thinks we’re smuggling diamonds instead of letting in sunlight.

That’s exactly how it feels. I’m still trying to wrap my head around why a new window triggers so many extra fees. I agree about bump-outs—less intimidating, but the cost per square foot can be higher than you’d think. I underestimated how much just a few feet would matter until I started measuring furniture. Building up honestly scared me off—my house is old and the idea of messing with the foundation or roof structure made my wallet nervous. If you’re already knee-deep in permits, might as well maximize what you get for the hassle, but it’s a lot to weigh.


Reply
Posts: 12
(@tech_jeff)
Active Member
Joined:

I totally get the hesitation with building up, especially with an older house. But honestly, sometimes bump-outs can be more disruptive than people expect—especially when you start thinking about insulation, rerouting utilities, or matching the exterior. I’ve seen folks get creative with interior layouts instead of expanding at all, like using built-ins or opening up non-load-bearing walls. Not always the answer, but it’s wild how much space you can “create” without actually adding square footage. Just a thought if the permits and costs start to feel overwhelming...


Reply
soniccoder70
Posts: 4
(@soniccoder70)
New Member
Joined:

That’s a good point about interior changes—sometimes just knocking out a closet or moving a doorway can make a room feel way bigger. I’ve done a couple bump-outs and honestly, tying in the roofline and matching old siding was more of a pain than I expected. Has anyone here tried converting an attic or basement instead of expanding out? Curious if that felt less disruptive in the end.


Reply
Posts: 10
(@gingerpupper56)
Active Member
Joined:

I hear you on the siding—matching old stuff is always trickier than it looks. I’ve finished a basement before and honestly, it was way less disruptive than tearing into the exterior. Still had to deal with moisture issues, but at least the mess stayed inside. Attic conversions seem cool too, but headroom can be a pain depending on your roof pitch. Sometimes just reworking what you’ve got inside is way less hassle overall.


Reply
Page 36 / 59
Share:
Scroll to Top