Remodeling discussions and local services.

 
pianist30
Discussion options
Discussion options
[#720]

Letting More Light In: My Experience Adding A Roof Bump-Out

Had a dormer put in last fall, and honestly, it changed the whole vibe of my upstairs. I went with one of those pre-fab kits (can’t remember the brand, but it was mid-range price-wise), and the crew had it in within a week. The extra headroom is great, but what surprised me most is how much brighter and less stuffy the space feels now.

One thing, though - the insulation around the new window isn’t quite as tight as I’d hoped. There’s a bit of a draft on windy days, which is kinda annoying after spending that much. Anyone else notice this with their dormers? Did you DIY or go pro? Wondering if I should try to fix it myself or call the installers back. Curious if this is just “normal” or if I got a shoddy job.


Join the conversation

Share your experience or ask a follow-up question.

64 replies

Not sure I’d call a draft around a new dormer window “normal,” especially if you paid for pro installation. I get that pre-fab kits can sometimes be a bit off in terms of fit, but a good crew should’ve sealed everything up tight. I actually did my own dormer a couple years back - took way longer than a week, but I obsessed over every bit of insulation and flashing. No drafts, even in the dead of winter.

Honestly, if you’re noticing airflow, it’s probably not just your imagination or “how it is.” Could be they skimped on spray foam or missed a gap with the vapor barrier. I’d lean toward calling the installers back before trying to fix it yourself. If you mess with it, they might blame you for any issues down the line. Plus, you paid for a job done right.

It’s wild how much difference a dormer makes, though. Mine turned a cramped attic into an actual usable room. But yeah, for what these things cost, there shouldn’t be any cold spots...


Reply
blogger28

I hear you on wanting a tight seal, but sometimes even with pros, you’ll get a little draft around new framing - especially if the house settles or the original roof isn’t perfectly square. Did they use low-expansion foam around the window itself, or just batt insulation? I’ve seen crews skip the foam to save time, and it makes a noticeable difference. Also, was the trim caulked inside and out? Sometimes what feels like a “draft” is just cold air radiating through the framing if there’s a thermal bridge. Not always a simple fix, unfortunately...


Reply
jackscott886

Yeah, I’ve run into that too - sometimes you do everything right and there’s still a little draft sneaking in. I’m with you on the foam; it makes a big difference compared to just stuffing batt insulation in there. One time I had a window where they skipped the foam and I could literally feel the cold air on my hand. Caulking inside and out helps, but if there’s a thermal bridge, it’s tough to totally fix without tearing things apart. Sometimes I just throw a heavy curtain up in winter and call it good enough...


Reply
pianist30
pianist30 Topic starter

Caulking inside and out helps, but if there’s a thermal bridge, it’s tough to totally fix without tearing things apart. Sometimes I just throw a heavy curtain up in winter and call it good enou...

Title: Letting More Light In: My Experience Adding A Roof Bump-Out

Funny you mention the heavy curtain trick - I did the same thing in my attic bedroom for years before I finally tackled the drafty window. Ended up pulling off the trim and found a gap big enough to stick a pencil through. A little low-expansion spray foam did the trick, and it’s been way more comfortable since. Still, I get what you mean about not wanting to tear things apart after paying for an install. Sometimes it feels like these “quick fixes” are just part of old house life…


Reply
michellevolunteer

Title: Letting More Light In: My Experience Adding A Roof Bump-Out

I hear you on the “quick fixes” - sometimes they’re just a way of life, especially in these older houses. I tried the heavy curtain thing for a while too, but eventually gave in and pulled apart the wall around my leaky window. Ended up finding a random piece of newspaper from 1967 stuffed in there as insulation… not exactly up to code. Some spray foam and new trim later, it’s way less drafty. Still, I kind of miss the old curtain fortress look.


Reply
bellaecho723

I swear, those newspaper-insulated walls are like a time capsule - my last place had a whole stack of vintage TV guides stuffed in the attic. At least you got some extra reading material out of it. Curious, did you think about just swapping the window for a bigger one instead of messing with the wall? Sometimes I wonder if it’s worth the hassle or just easier to go big and bright from the start.


Reply

Curious, did you think about just swapping the window for a bigger one instead of messing with the wall?

Honestly, I thought about it, but with these old houses, nothing’s ever simple. Swapping for a bigger window sounds easy till you hit some mystery support beam or ancient wiring. Plus, I kinda like the quirks - my walls are basically Swiss cheese at this point anyway. Sometimes the hassle is half the fun... or at least that’s what I tell myself when I’m knee-deep in plaster dust.


Reply

Swapping for a bigger window sounds easy till you hit some mystery support beam or ancient wiring.

Totally get this. I’ve tried “just” swapping windows before and ended up chasing hidden costs:

- Old framing never matches modern window sizes - custom orders = $$$.
- Found knob-and-tube wiring once, which meant calling in an electrician.
- Sometimes the wall’s just not square anymore... nothing lines up.

Honestly, sometimes it’s cheaper to work with what you’ve got than open up a whole new can of worms. Those quirks add character, but they sure keep you on your toes.


Reply
joseh10

Yeah, the “just pop in a bigger window” thing is always way more complicated than it sounds. When I did mine, I thought it’d be a weekend project - ended up with half the wall open, a weird old vent pipe in the way, and a trip to the lumber yard for custom headers. It’s wild how nothing in these old houses is ever standard. Sometimes I wonder if the original builders just made it up as they went... but hey, at least there’s always a story behind every crooked window frame.


Reply
josephrebel403

Sometimes I wonder if the original builders just made it up as they went...

I get what you’re saying, but I actually think a lot of those weird quirks in old houses were intentional - just not up to today’s codes or expectations. Ever notice how some framing is way beefier than it needs to be, or you find random shims everywhere? I kind of respect the creativity, even if it drives me nuts when I’m trying to make things square. Did you consider just reframing the whole opening instead of working around the vent? Sometimes starting fresh is actually less hassle, even if it feels like more work at first.


Reply
gingercollector

I get the urge to just reframe everything, but sometimes that opens up a whole can of worms. Here’s how I see it:

- Reframing is great if you’re dealing with rotten wood or structural issues, but if everything’s solid and you just need to work around a vent or some oddball framing, I’d rather adapt than tear it all out.
- Old houses are weirdly overbuilt in spots, but I’ve also run into stuff where they clearly just ran out of material and used whatever was lying around. Not always intentional, in my experience.
- Shims everywhere? Yeah, I’m convinced half of them were just trying to make up for warped lumber or floors that were never level to begin with.

I’ve found that working around quirks can actually save time - unless you’re planning on opening up more walls anyway. Plus, you never know what you’ll find once you start demo. Sometimes it’s better to leave sleeping dogs (and questionable framing) lie...


Reply

Title: Sometimes You Just Have to Rip It Out

I get where you’re coming from about working around the weird stuff, but I’ve learned (the hard way) that sometimes adapting ends up being more work in the long run. Especially with a roof bump-out - if you’re tying into old framing that’s out of square or full of shims, you can end up fighting it every step of the way. I tried to “work around” some funky rafters in my last place, thinking I’d save time and money. Ended up with a wavy ceiling and a window that never quite sat right. Had to go back, tear out more than I wanted, and basically start over.

Here’s how I look at it now:

1. Open up the area you’re working on and really assess what’s there. If you see a bunch of shims, weird angles, or questionable connections, it might be worth biting the bullet and reframing that section. It’s a pain, but at least you know what you’re dealing with.
2. If you’re just dealing with one or two oddball spots (like a vent or a single stud out of place), sure, adapt. But if the whole area is a patchwork, you’ll probably save yourself headaches by just making it right from the start.
3. Old houses are full of surprises - sometimes good, sometimes not so much. I’ve found everything from newspapers stuffed in walls to random bricks holding up floor joists. Once you start demo, you might find bigger issues that need attention anyway.

I get wanting to avoid opening up a can of worms, but sometimes those worms are already wriggling behind the drywall. Just my two cents - sometimes “leaving sleeping dogs lie” means you end up with a lumpy floor or a crooked window down the line.


Reply
dfox68

Ended up with a wavy ceiling and a window that never quite sat right. Had to go back, tear out more than I wanted, and basically start over.

I hear you, but I’ve had the opposite luck a couple times. Sometimes you rip everything out and suddenly you’re rebuilding half the house because nothing lines up anywhere. Like you said, “old houses are full of surprises” - sometimes those surprises are your weekend plans disappearing. I’ve managed to fudge a few weird angles with some creative trim and a lot of caulk. Not perfect, but sometimes “good enough” really is good enough if you’re not staring at it every day.


Reply

That’s the story of every old house remodel, honestly. You open one wall and suddenly you’re fixing three other things you didn’t even know were problems. I’ve learned to expect nothing to be square. Ever tried scribing drywall to a ceiling that dips an inch over eight feet? That’s always a fun afternoon... Sometimes you just have to pick your battles and accept a little character in the finished product.


Reply
sonic_moore

Sometimes you just have to pick your battles and accept a little character in the finished product.

Funny how “character” becomes code for “that spot where the old joists decided to do their own thing.” Had a bump-out job last year - thought I’d just be reframing, but ended up chasing a sagging ridge for half a day. You ever try matching new lumber to 100-year-old timber? Nothing lines up, but somehow it all comes together in the end.


Reply
literature426

You ever try matching new lumber to 100-year-old timber? Nothing lines up, but somehow it all comes together in the end.

That’s the story every time I open up an old roof. Last project, I was determined to keep as much of the original framing as possible for sustainability reasons, but wow - those hand-hewn beams are never straight. Ended up scribing every new rafter just to get a halfway decent fit. It’s a puzzle, but honestly, that “character” is half the charm... even if it drives you nuts during install.


Reply

I get what you’re saying about “character,” but I’ve gotta admit, sometimes I wonder if we romanticize it a bit too much. Those old beams might look cool, but when you’re dealing with sagging lines and weird angles, it’s not just a puzzle - it’s a headache. I’ve had projects where the old wood was so out of whack, I started questioning whether it was worth saving at all.

You mentioned,

“that ‘character’ is half the charm... even if it drives you nuts during install.”
I don’t know, maybe I’m just less patient, but I’d argue that at some point, function has to win over charm. I love history as much as the next person, but sometimes a straight line is just... better. Ever feel like you’re fighting a losing battle trying to make new work with the old? I get the appeal, but there’s something to be said for starting fresh - at least in a few spots.


Reply

Letting More Light In: My Experience Adding A Roof Bump-Out

I totally get where you’re coming from - sometimes “character” just means extra hours and headaches. But I’ll push back a bit, because I’ve found that working with those old, uneven beams can actually add a lot to the final look, even if it’s a pain during install.

- When I did a bump-out in a 1920s bungalow, the ceiling lines were all over the place. We debated ripping everything out and starting fresh, but in the end, we kept the original beams and just worked around the quirks. The end result had this warmth and authenticity you just can’t fake with new materials.
- That said, I’m not against replacing stuff when it’s truly shot. If a beam is structurally unsound or just too warped to work with, I’ll swap it out. But I try to keep as much as possible, even if it means a little extra scribing and shimming.
- Straight lines are great, but sometimes a little imperfection gives a space more personality. I guess it depends on the project and the client’s tolerance for “wonky charm.”

Honestly, there’s no one-size-fits-all answer. Sometimes you just have to pick your battles and decide what’s worth saving.


Reply

Keeping those original beams can definitely add a ton of character, but I’ve found it’s a balancing act. Sometimes, the amount of shimming and scribing needed to get drywall or trim to look halfway decent around old framing can get out of hand. I usually end up spending more time on finish work just to make sure the “quirks” don’t turn into actual problems down the line. Still, when it works, you get that unique look you just can’t replicate with new lumber. It’s always a judgment call - sometimes you win, sometimes you’re cursing under your breath at 7pm trying to get a reveal to line up...


Reply
Scroll to Top